FILM REVIEW: HOLES
By Derrick Clements
The following article is not a film review; it's an act of public
service.
I am going to attempt to persuade everyone who is within the sound
of this paper to go and see the film "Holes." Call it missionary work.
To put it simply, "Holes" is not your average PG Disney
movie.
For one thing, an "ordinary" director (with some
"extra-ordinary" talents) directed the film: Andrew Davis. Think you've never heard of him? He's the "Fugitive" director (not
to be confused with Roman Polanski, the fugitive director).
For another thing, the script is one of the smartest in
years. Written by first-time
screenwriter Louis Sachar, that's saying something. On top of that, it's a perfect adaptation; in
other words, it leaves the important things in, and finds a way to generate the
same emotions that the book created with additional scenes or narration. This better way of adapting book-to-movie
contrasts with the more common, and less talented, method of leaving the
important things in, as well as the less important scenes, then cutting the
movie to pieces in the editing room, then releasing a totally cool DVD with 20
hours of bonus footage because the screenwriters couldn't concisely adapt the
"brilliant novel."
You know who you are, adapters.
Another thing that makes the script so amazing is that Sachar
wrote the award winning, best selling, critically acclaimed novel. This is amazing because writers don't usually
like to modify their timeless, critically accepted masterpieces.
I know; I am one.
Most filmmakers know that emotion is an important piece of the
story. But often, in movies, these
emotions look phony, as if they were only there to create a shield around the
vacant story, manipulating the audience into thinking there really is one.
In "Holes," the emotions are genuine, and the story is
everything but vacant.
Basically, it's about Stanley Yelnats IV, an unlucky kid who is
wrongly convicted of a crime and as a consequence goes to
A number of back-stories soon unravel, and the audience begins to
question the simplicity of
"Holes" is fast-paced; even beautifully random at times,
but it's not choppy. For each conflict
or laugh, viewers are given a clue that shows how it all fits together, how
each scene relates to
The intricacy of the plot could have easily been made confusing,
and the film would've been deemed by a small cult of critics as
"artistic," but audiences probably wouldn't have liked it; audiences
don't like movies that are in some sort of code, artistic or not. "Holes" spites silly tradition,
proving that it's indeed possible to tell an intricate story so visibly. Audiences are taken right into the middle of
the evolving story with bits of humor, action, romance and suspense, making
piecing together the film's unresolved middle just as fun as its conclusion.
Well, my work here is done.
I leave you now with two words of solemn encouragement:
Dig in.